Side-by-side comparison
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Capta: Capacity Planning and Financial Management for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 408 | 5 |
| Active installs | 12,974+ | 28+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | ★ From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
Structure by Tempo and Capta each lead on different measured dimensions — pick by the one that matters most to you.
Listed entry pricing: Structure by Tempo at From $1/yr, Capta at From $0/yr. See the plans table for what each tier includes.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • Capta: Capacity Planning and Financial Management for Jira audit
| Field | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Capta |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Listed features | — | 3 |
|---|
No features listed.
| Keyword | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Capta |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #418 |
No description available.
Capta: Capacity Planning and Financial Management for Jira is cheaper to start with — it offers a free plan and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM doesn't list one. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
Capta: Capacity Planning and Financial Management for Jira has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM (4.5★ from 408 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Capta: Capacity Planning and Financial Management for Jira holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (408 vs 5).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has 408 published reviews; Capta: Capacity Planning and Financial Management for Jira has 5 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Capta: Capacity Planning and Financial Management for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Capta: Capacity Planning and Financial Management for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.