Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Integrate GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and any other Git repository with Jira. View Git commits, branches, tags, and pull requests in Jira Issues and Projects + Code Review in Jira. Create GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps branches and pull requests.
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 406 | 342 |
| Active installs | 13,551+ | 8,994+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | From $1/yr |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Featured placements | 1 | — |
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM edges out GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira on rating (4.5★ vs 4.4★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing sits in similar territory: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr, GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira at From $1/yr (within ~25% of each other on the entry tier). At this overlap, total cost of ownership comes from how per-tier capacity gates align with your order volume — confirm both apps' upgrade triggers against your projected scale before deciding. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (406 reviews vs 342), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira's 342-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira audit
Not featured in any section recently.
Both Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira offer paid plans only. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr; GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 406 reviews) compared to GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira (4.4★ from 342 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has more onboarding documentation maturity (406 reviews vs 342), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (406 reviews). GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (342 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GitHub, GitLab, & Azure DevOps - Git Integration for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.