Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Better than subtasks or action items, Checklists empower you to create ToDo lists, Definition of Done, Acceptance Criteria, and QA lists on Jira issues. Integrate checklists with Jira automation, JQL, workflow validators and post functions.
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 408 | 143 |
| Active installs | 12,974+ | 4,662+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | ★ From $0.5/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM edges out Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders on rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing differs significantly: Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders at From $0.5/yr vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr (Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM is roughly 2.0x the entry-tier cost of Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 143), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders's 143-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders audit
| Keyword | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #84 |
| form | Not ranked | #176 |
Both Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders offer paid plans only. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr; Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders starts at From $0.5/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders (4.3★ from 143 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 143), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (143 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Checklists for Jira (Enterprise) by HeroCoders" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.