Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Discover a lifecycle management platform that orchestrates all evidence collection, documentation, compliance, and testing into one source of truth for your teams. Use Jira to develop safe medical device applications and avoid losing months of work.
| Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 408 | 12 |
| Active installs | 12,974+ | 287+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | ★ Free |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira offers a free tier (Free) while Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 12), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's 408-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira audit
Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 12 reviews) compared to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM (4.5★ from 408 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 12), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (12 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Ketryx Lifecycle Management for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.