Side-by-side comparison
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
Manage, reuse, and automate tests across projects—all inside Jira. Align teams and catch defects quickly with AI-powered, no-code automation. Gain full visibility with seamless test execution, cross-project sharing, and built-in reporting.
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 408 | ★ 492 |
| Active installs | 12,974+ | 15,319+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — |
On the measured data here, Structure by Tempo leads on more dimensions (2 vs 0). Pick Zephyr if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
Pricing sits in similar territory: Structure by Tempo at From $1/yr, Zephyr at From $1/yr (within ~25% on the listed entry price).
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira audit
| Field | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| 6 tiers |
| Listed features | — | 3 |
|---|
No features listed.
No description available.
Neither Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM nor Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira lists a free plan. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM lists no paid plan with a published price; Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira lists no paid plan with a published price. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira (4.1★ from 492 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (492 vs 408).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has 408 published reviews; Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira has 492 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Zephyr - Test Management and Automation for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.