Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Let users set their time away from work and have designated alternatives assigned. Define flexible assignment rules per project or globally that support unavailability definitions. Admins can view and manage global unavailability list.
| Time Off Management & Auto Assignment | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Tempo creates embedded solutions that enable organizations, including some of the world’s most prestigious brands, to track, plan, manage and understand time, their most constrained resource.
| Metric | Time Off Management & Auto Assignment | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 15 | ★ 896 |
| Active installs | 115+ | 26,977+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Time Off Management & Auto Assignment is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Time Off Management & Auto Assignment at From $0/yr, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 15), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Time Off Management & Auto Assignment's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Time Off Management & Auto Assignment; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 896-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Time Off Management & Auto Assignment's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Time Off Management & Auto Assignment audit • Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit
| Keyword | Time Off Management & Auto Assignment | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| time | #45 | #7 |
Both Time Off Management & Auto Assignment and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking offer paid plans only. Time Off Management & Auto Assignment starts at From $0/yr; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Time Off Management & Auto Assignment has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 15 reviews) compared to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.1★ from 896 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Time Off Management & Auto Assignment holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 15), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Time Off Management & Auto Assignment typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (15 reviews). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Time Off Management & Auto Assignment and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Time Off Management & Auto Assignment" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.