Multi Level & Tree Fields vs EasySSO for Jira (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO)

Multi Level & Tree Fields and EasySSO for Jira (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO) are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Multi Level & Tree Fields or EasySSO for Jira (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO)?

Multi Level & Tree Fields (5.0★, 25 reviews) and EasySSO for Jira (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO) (4.9★, 37 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Multi Level & Tree Fields or EasySSO for Jira (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO)?

Multi Level & Tree Fields holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Multi Level & Tree Fields or EasySSO for Jira (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO)?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. EasySSO for Jira (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO) has the deeper published review base (37 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Multi Level & Tree Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). EasySSO for Jira (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (37 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Multi Level & Tree Fields and EasySSO for Jira (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO)?

Migration support varies by app and category. Multi Level & Tree Fields and EasySSO for Jira (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Multi Level & Tree Fields" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.