Multi Level & Tree Fields vs Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira

Multi Level & Tree Fields edges out Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Multi Level & Tree Fields at From $0/yr, Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira has the larger user base (267 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Multi Level & Tree Fields's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Multi Level & Tree Fields; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira's 267-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Multi Level & Tree Fields's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: Multi Level & Tree Fields audit • Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira audit

• Browse the atlassian compare hub
• Browse all atlassian apps
• Compare metrics glossary