Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Multi Level & Tree Fields is a powerful Jira app that lets you build complex hierarchies, organize issues with multi-level categories, and manage data relationships more clearly, making everything easier to navigate and understand.
| Multi Level & Tree Fields | Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Bulk clone Jira projects, epics and work items at enterprise scale — up to 100,000 per clone. Copy projects into reusable project templates, automate recurring tasks, and migrate or consolidate Jira Cloud instances with full data integrity.
| Metric | Multi Level & Tree Fields | Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 25 | ★ 134 |
| Active installs | 247+ | 11,948+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Multi Level & Tree Fields is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics)'s 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Multi Level & Tree Fields at From $0/yr, Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) has the larger user base (134 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Multi Level & Tree Fields's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Multi Level & Tree Fields; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics)'s 134-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Multi Level & Tree Fields's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Multi Level & Tree Fields audit • Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) audit
| — |
| Keyword | Multi Level & Tree Fields | Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #140 | #136 |
| form | #247 | #244 |
Both Multi Level & Tree Fields and Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) offer paid plans only. Multi Level & Tree Fields starts at From $0/yr; Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Multi Level & Tree Fields has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 25 reviews) compared to Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) (4.5★ from 134 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Multi Level & Tree Fields holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) has the deeper published review base (134 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Multi Level & Tree Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (134 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Multi Level & Tree Fields and Deep Clone for Jira (Copy Projects, Bulk, Templates, Epics) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Multi Level & Tree Fields" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.