Is Multi Level & Tree Fields or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM cheaper?

Both Multi Level & Tree Fields and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM offer paid plans only. Multi Level & Tree Fields starts at From $0/yr; Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Multi Level & Tree Fields or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM?

Multi Level & Tree Fields has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 25 reviews) compared to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM (4.5★ from 408 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Multi Level & Tree Fields or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM?

Multi Level & Tree Fields holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Multi Level & Tree Fields or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Multi Level & Tree Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Multi Level & Tree Fields and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM?

Migration support varies by app and category. Multi Level & Tree Fields and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Multi Level & Tree Fields" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.

AppRanks

Multi Level & Tree vs Structure by Tempo — Atlassian

Multi Level & Tree Fields vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM

Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points

Multi Level & Tree Fields

5.0·25reviews·247+installs

Multi Level & Tree Fields is a powerful Jira app that lets you build complex hierarchies, organize issues with multi-level categories, and manage data relationships more clearly, making everything easier to navigate and understand.

atlassianFrom $0/yr

Change

1. Listing metadata

Field-level data

	Multi Level & Tree Fields	Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM
Tagline	“Multi Level & Tree Fields is a powerful Jira app that lets you build complex hierarchies, organize issues with multi-level categories, and manage data relationships more clearly, making everything easier to navigate and understand.”231 chars	“Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.”111 chars
Description	944 / 5000 chars19% used	1218 / 5000 chars24% used
Screenshots	—	—
Languages
Platforms	Atlassian	Atlassian
Developer	Almbase	Tempo Software
Listed	—	—
Last updated	—	—

At a glance

7 metrics · auto-computed

Feature comparison between Multi Level & Tree Fields and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM
Metric	Multi Level & Tree Fields	Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM
Rating	★ 5.0 ★	4.5 ★
Total reviews	25	★ 408
Active installs	247+	12,974+
Free plan	—	—
Pricing	★ From $0/yr	From $1/yr
Pricing tiers	6 tiers	6 tiers
Listed features	3	3

AppRanks verdict

Generated from live data on this page

The call

Based on the data on this page, Multi Level & Tree Fields is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing

Pricing entry tiers: Multi Level & Tree Fields at From $0/yr, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Review base

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Multi Level & Tree Fields's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Who should pick what

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Multi Level & Tree Fields; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's 408-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Multi Level & Tree Fields's broader-but-shallower coverage.

How this is generated

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: Multi Level & Tree Fields audit • Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit

Keyword	Multi Level & Tree Fields	Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM
forms	#140	Not ranked
form	#247	Not ranked

7. App details

Long-form description · keyword frequency

Multi Level & Tree Fields

Request a new feature | Book a demo | Core FeaturesJira's native cascading field stops at 2 levels. MLTF removes that limit entirely — giving you full control over how your team structures, navigates, and reports on complex data.Feature Highlights* Unlimited hierarchy depth — no level restrictions* Advanced Multi-Level field types: assign a different field type (Single Select, Multi Select, Radio Button, or Checkbox) to each level independently* Configure options per issue type or group* Level-based JQL search — filter by levels of your hierarchy* Dashboard gadgets — visualize field data with Pie & Donut charts* Import & export options via CSV or JSON for fast setup* Compatible with Jira Service Management customer portal* Jira Automation supportAvailable Field Types* Multi Level (Advanced Cascading)* Multi Level (Cascading)* Option Path (Multi Select)* Option Path (Single Select)* Tree (Multi Select)* Tree (Single Select)

Top keywords

select6×4.51%
field5×3.76%
multi5×3.76%
level4×3.01%
cascading3×2.26%
multi select3×2.26%
single3×2.26%
single select3×2.26%
advanced2×1.50%
data2×1.50%
field types2×1.50%
hierarchy2×1.50%

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM

Jira is a powerful project management tool, but team members, boards, and filters often scatter essential information throughout the platform. Structure PPM organizes issues from across your portfolio into one streamlined dashboard. The project portfolio management application also integrates with other Tempo solutions on the Atlassian Marketplace, such as Tempo Timesheets, Strategic Roadmaps & Gantt Charts for Structure PPM. When you link Jira issues, Structure can create a customized hierarchy that, when combined with formulas and aggregation functions, provides the big picture view necessary for: Reporting Portfolio planning Project resource planning PI planning Resource allocation Sprint & epic planning Release management Progress tracking Backlog grooming Book a demo to learn how combining Tempo Structure with Atlassian’s Jira software can solve your project management challenges. Then, try it out with a free 30-day trial. VIDEO | DEMO | RELEASE NOTES | PARTNERS | ROVO AGENT

Top keywords

management4×2.88%
planning4×2.88%
project4×2.88%
structure4×2.88%
jira3×2.16%
portfolio3×2.16%
tempo3×2.16%
atlassian2×1.44%
demo2×

Multi Level & Tree Fields vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM

Multi Level & Tree Fields

1. Listing metadata

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM

At a glance

AppRanks verdict

2. Pricing & plans

3. Features

4. Categories & rankings

5. Search rankings

6. Activity in the last 90 days

Multi Level & Tree Fields · 1 changes

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM · 8 changes

7. App details

Frequently asked

Is Multi Level & Tree Fields or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM cheaper?

Which has better reviews, Multi Level & Tree Fields or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM?

Should I choose Multi Level & Tree Fields or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM?

Which is faster to set up, Multi Level & Tree Fields or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM?

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

See full keyword rankings, install trends, and weekly alerts

More popular comparisons

Can I migrate data between Multi Level & Tree Fields and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM?