Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Gauge Gadget makes it easy for you to visualize the number of issues present in a particular filter with a selection of gauges of 3 different styles.
| Gauge Gadget | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Tempo creates embedded solutions that enable organizations, including some of the world’s most prestigious brands, to track, plan, manage and understand time, their most constrained resource.
| Metric | Gauge Gadget | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 ★ | ★ 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 30 | ★ 896 |
| Active installs | 1,122+ | 26,977+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking edges out Gauge Gadget on rating (4.1★ vs 3.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Gauge Gadget at From $0/yr, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 30), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Gauge Gadget's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Gauge Gadget's 30-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Gauge Gadget audit • Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit
| Keyword | Gauge Gadget | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #7 |
Both Gauge Gadget and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking offer paid plans only. Gauge Gadget starts at From $0/yr; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the higher average rating (4.1★ from 896 reviews) compared to Gauge Gadget (3.9★ from 30 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking holds the higher average rating (4.1★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 30), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Gauge Gadget typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (30 reviews). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Gauge Gadget and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Gauge Gadget" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.