com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours vs Jenkins for Jira (Official)

Based on the data on this page, Jenkins for Jira (Official) is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.6★ vs com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours's 3.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours at Free, Jenkins for Jira (Official) at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Jenkins for Jira (Official); mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours's 27-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Jenkins for Jira (Official)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours or Jenkins for Jira (Official) cheaper?

Both com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours and Jenkins for Jira (Official) offer paid plans only. com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours starts at Free; Jenkins for Jira (Official) starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours or Jenkins for Jira (Official)?

Jenkins for Jira (Official) has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 26 reviews) compared to com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours (3.9★ from 27 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours or Jenkins for Jira (Official)?

Jenkins for Jira (Official) holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours or Jenkins for Jira (Official)?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours has the deeper published review base (27 vs 26), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (27 reviews). Jenkins for Jira (Official) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (26 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.