Side-by-side comparison
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Metric | com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 ★ | ★ 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 27 | ★ 408 |
| Active installs | 9,535+ | 12,974+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free | From $1/yr |
On the measured data here, Structure by Tempo leads on more dimensions (3 vs 1). Pick com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours lists a free tier (Free); Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM lists From $1/yr.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours audit • Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit
| Field | com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | |
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours is cheaper to start with — it offers a free plan and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM doesn't list one. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours (3.9★ from 27 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (408 vs 27).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours has 27 published reviews; Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has 408 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from com.adaptavist.jira.scriptrunner.behaviours" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.