Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Mosaic | draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Create secure, user-friendly diagrams with the top-rated diagramming solution since 2013 and one of the first major apps on Forge.
| Metric | Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates | draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 112 | ★ 1.2k |
| Active installs | 4,518+ | 62,629+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.8★ vs Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates at From $0/yr, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the larger user base (1,204 reviews vs 112), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates's 112-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates audit • draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts audit
| Keyword | Mosaic | draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts |
|---|---|---|
| form | #53 | #255 |
Both Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates and draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts offer paid plans only. Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates starts at From $0/yr; draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 1,204 reviews) compared to Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates (4.3★ from 112 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the deeper published review base (1,204 vs 112), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (112 reviews). draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,204 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates and draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.