Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Mosaic | Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Generate professional PDFs from your Confluence content with full control over styling. Export single pages or entire page trees seamlessly. Export versions, variants, translations, & other third-party app content.
| Metric | Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates | Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 112 | ★ 227 |
| Active installs | 4,518+ | 8,909+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $0.5/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.7★ vs Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates at From $0/yr, Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence at From $0.5/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence has the larger user base (227 reviews vs 112), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates's 112-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates audit • Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence audit
| Keyword | Mosaic | Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| form | #53 | Not ranked |
Both Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates and Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence offer paid plans only. Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates starts at From $0/yr; Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence starts at From $0.5/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 227 reviews) compared to Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates (4.3★ from 112 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence has the deeper published review base (227 vs 112), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (112 reviews). Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (227 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates and Scroll PDF Exporter for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.