Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Customize and automate Jira workflows with JMWE. Built for advanced, unlimited automation and smarter workflow control
| Mosaic | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.4 ★ | ★ 3.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 108 | ★ 517 |
| Active installs | 4,658+ | 17,614+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace merchants — 3.9★ vs Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the larger user base (517 reviews vs 108), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE); mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates's 108-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE)'s broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates audit • Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) audit
| Keyword | Mosaic | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) |
|---|---|---|
| form | #50 | Not ranked |
Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the higher average rating (3.9★ from 517 reviews) compared to Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates (3.4★ from 108 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has more onboarding documentation maturity (517 reviews vs 108), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (108 reviews). Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (517 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates and Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mosaic: Content Formatting Macros, Tabs LaTeX HTML Templates" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.