Side-by-side comparison
Jira productivity reports: time in status, cycle time, lead time and transitions between statuses, sprint performance report
| Metric | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | Time in Status |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 139 | ★ 207 |
| Active installs | 4,590+ | 5,378+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | — |
On the measured data here, Time in Status leads on more dimensions (2 vs 0). Pick Timesheets by Tempo if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
Listed entry pricing: Timesheets by Tempo at From $0/yr, Time in Status at From $0/yr. See the plans table for what each tier includes.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit • Time in Status audit
| Field | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | Time in Status |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | |
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| 3 |
No features listed.
| Keyword | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | Time in Status |
|---|---|---|
| time | #11 | #1 |
| forms | Not ranked | #238 |
| form | Not ranked | #350 |
No description available.
Time in Status is cheaper to start with — it offers a free plan and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking doesn't list one. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.6★, 139 reviews) and Time in Status (4.5★, 207 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Time in Status has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (207 vs 139).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has 139 published reviews; Time in Status has 207 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking and Time in Status both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.