Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Clockify | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Clockify | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Metric | Clockify: Time Tracking & Timesheet | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 ★ | ★ 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 127 | ★ 408 |
| Active installs | 9,034+ | 12,974+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.5★ vs Clockify: Time Tracking & Timesheet's 3.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Clockify: Time Tracking & Timesheet offers a free tier (Free) while Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 127), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Clockify: Time Tracking & Timesheet's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Clockify: Time Tracking & Timesheet's 127-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Clockify: Time Tracking & Timesheet audit • Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit
| Keyword | Clockify | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM |
|---|---|---|
| time | #26 | Not ranked |
Clockify: Time Tracking & Timesheet is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to Clockify: Time Tracking & Timesheet (3.9★ from 127 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 127), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Clockify: Time Tracking & Timesheet typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (127 reviews). Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Clockify: Time Tracking & Timesheet and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Clockify: Time Tracking & Timesheet" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.