Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Provides macros to include files and metadata from private and public Bitbucket repositories into a Confluence page. This helps to always have up-to-date project documentation (e.g. README.md), source code and config files in your Confluence pages.
| Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc) | Better PDF Exporter for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
Powerful Jira PDF export for issue lists, invoices, bills, timesheets, Burn Down chart, Gantt chart, Requirement Specifications, Release Notes, story cards, custom business reports and documents! Share, print, email, archive and report issues easily.
| Metric | Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc) | Better PDF Exporter for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 19 | ★ 466 |
| Active installs | 1,037+ | 4,385+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Better PDF Exporter for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.8★ vs Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc)'s 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc) at From $0/yr, Better PDF Exporter for Jira at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Better PDF Exporter for Jira has the larger user base (466 reviews vs 19), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Better PDF Exporter for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc)'s 19-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Better PDF Exporter for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc) audit • Better PDF Exporter for Jira audit
| — |
| Keyword | Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc) | Better PDF Exporter for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #166 | Not ranked |
| form | #276 | Not ranked |
Both Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc) and Better PDF Exporter for Jira offer paid plans only. Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc) starts at From $0/yr; Better PDF Exporter for Jira starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Better PDF Exporter for Jira has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 466 reviews) compared to Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc) (4.3★ from 19 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Better PDF Exporter for Jira holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Better PDF Exporter for Jira has the deeper published review base (466 vs 19), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (19 reviews). Better PDF Exporter for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (466 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc) and Better PDF Exporter for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Include from Bitbucket to Confluence (Markdown, AsciiDoc)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.