Aha! Roadmaps for Jira vs Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence

Based on the data on this page, Aha! Roadmaps for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.9★ vs Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Aha! Roadmaps for Jira has the larger user base (357 reviews vs 45), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Aha! Roadmaps for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence's 45-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Aha! Roadmaps for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence or Aha! Roadmaps for Jira?

Aha! Roadmaps for Jira has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 357 reviews) compared to Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence (4.1★ from 45 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence or Aha! Roadmaps for Jira?

Aha! Roadmaps for Jira holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence or Aha! Roadmaps for Jira?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Aha! Roadmaps for Jira has the deeper published review base (357 vs 45), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (45 reviews). Aha! Roadmaps for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (357 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence and Aha! Roadmaps for Jira?

Migration support varies by app and category. Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence and Aha! Roadmaps for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Navitabs - Navigation Macros for Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.