Translations for Confluence vs Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking

Translations for Confluence and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking are evenly matched on rating (4.2★ vs 4.1★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Pricing entry tiers: Translations for Confluence at From $0/yr, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 35), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Translations for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Translations for Confluence or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking cheaper?

Both Translations for Confluence and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking offer paid plans only. Translations for Confluence starts at From $0/yr; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Translations for Confluence or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking?

Translations for Confluence (4.2★, 35 reviews) and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.1★, 896 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Translations for Confluence or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking?

Translations for Confluence holds the higher average rating (4.2★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Translations for Confluence or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 35), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Translations for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (35 reviews). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.