Capacity Tracker vs Approval Path for Jira

Based on the data on this page, Approval Path for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Capacity Tracker's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing differs significantly: Capacity Tracker at From $0.5/yr vs Approval Path for Jira at From $1/yr (Approval Path for Jira is roughly 2.0x the entry-tier cost of Capacity Tracker). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Approval Path for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Capacity Tracker's 36-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Approval Path for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Capacity Tracker or Approval Path for Jira cheaper?

Both Capacity Tracker and Approval Path for Jira offer paid plans only. Capacity Tracker starts at From $0.5/yr; Approval Path for Jira starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Capacity Tracker or Approval Path for Jira?

Approval Path for Jira has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 26 reviews) compared to Capacity Tracker (4.5★ from 36 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Capacity Tracker or Approval Path for Jira?

Approval Path for Jira holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Capacity Tracker or Approval Path for Jira?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Capacity Tracker has the deeper published review base (36 vs 26), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Capacity Tracker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (36 reviews). Approval Path for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (26 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Capacity Tracker and Approval Path for Jira?

Migration support varies by app and category. Capacity Tracker and Approval Path for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Approval Path for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.