PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM vs Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking

Side-by-side comparison

PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM

5.0·3reviews·15+installs

Show custom fields, SLA, assets, and important information directly in the Jira Service Management portal, without relying on comments or descriptions. Improve transparency for customers and reduce rework for the support team.

atlassianFrom $0/yr

Change

New comparison

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking

4.6·298reviews·12,302+installs

atlassianFrom $0/yr

Change

At a glance

7 metrics · ★ = leads on this metric

Feature comparison between PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking
Metric	PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM	Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking
Rating	★ 5.0 ★	4.6 ★
Total reviews	3	★ 298
Active installs	15+	12,302+
Free plan	—	—
Pricing	From $0/yr	From $0/yr
Pricing tiers	6 tiers	—

AppRanks verdict

Generated from live data on this page

The call

PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM and Timesheets by Tempo each lead on different measured dimensions — pick by the one that matters most to you.

Where PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM leads

Higher average rating: 5.0★ vs 4.6★.
Lists a free plan; Timesheets by Tempo doesn't.

Where Timesheets by Tempo leads

More published reviews: 298 vs 3.
Ranks higher in Administrative tools: #5 vs #2064 of 2,503.

Pricing

Listed entry pricing: PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM at From $0/yr, Timesheets by Tempo at From $0/yr. See the plans table for what each tier includes.

How this is generated

Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology

Read each app's audit: PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM audit • Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit

1. Listing metadata

Field-level data

Field	PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM	Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking
Tagline	“Show custom fields, SLA, assets, and important information directly in the Jira Service Management portal, without relying on comments or descriptions. Improve transparency for customers and reduce rework for the support team.”	—
Platforms	Atlassian	Atlassian
Developer	AppRL	Appfire

2. Pricing & plans

Marketplace-listed plans · paid plans cheapest first, not matched tier-for-tier

Tier

PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking

Free plan

Frequently asked

Common questions about this comparison

Is PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking cheaper?

PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM is cheaper to start with — it offers a free plan and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking doesn't list one. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.

Which has better reviews, PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking?

PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.6★ from 298 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking?

PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (298 vs 3).

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM has 3 published reviews; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has 298 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.

Can I migrate data between PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking?

Migration support varies by app and category. PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.

PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM vs Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking

PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking

At a glance

AppRanks verdict

1. Listing metadata

2. Pricing & plans

3. Features

4. Categories & rankings

5. Activity in the last 90 days

PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM · 1 changes

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking · 7 changes

6. App details

Frequently asked

Is PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking cheaper?

Which has better reviews, PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking?

Should I choose PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking?

Which is faster to set up, PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM or Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking?

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Can I migrate data between PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking?

Track these apps' keyword rankings and listing changes

More popular comparisons