Side-by-side comparison
Show custom fields, SLA, assets, and important information directly in the Jira Service Management portal, without relying on comments or descriptions. Improve transparency for customers and reduce rework for the support team.
Gliffy is the secure, intuitive technical diagramming tool fully integrated in Confluence. We're an Atlassian Platinum Top Vendor with over 18 million users—more than any other diagramming app in the Marketplace. Find out why with a free trial.
| Metric | PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM | Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 799 |
| Active installs | 15+ | 16,258+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 |
PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM and Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence each lead on different measured dimensions — pick by the one that matters most to you.
Listed entry pricing: PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM at From $0/yr, Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence at From $0/yr. See the plans table for what each tier includes.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM audit • Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence audit
| Field | PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM | Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| 3 |
Both PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM and Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence offer a free plan. PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM lists no paid plan with a published price; Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence lists no paid plan with a published price. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence (4.5★ from 799 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (799 vs 3).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM has 3 published reviews; Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has 799 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM and Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PortalView Dynamic Fields for JSM" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.