Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
- Add custom HTML to Confluence pages - Use CSS and Javascript to enhance looks and functionality - Run code snippets - Embed external contents and web pages as Iframe
| Pivot Report | HTML Macro for Confluence | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Pivot Report makes it easy to create visibility for different management levels and assist with analysis ending with a precisely informed business decision
| Metric | Pivot Report: Roll Up Epic Issues, Worklogs & Time in Status | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 80 | 31 |
| Active installs | 906+ | 2,327+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0.5/yr | ★ From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Pivot Report: Roll Up Epic Issues, Worklogs & Time in Status and HTML Macro for Confluence are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Pivot Report: Roll Up Epic Issues, Worklogs & Time in Status at From $0.5/yr, HTML Macro for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Pivot Report: Roll Up Epic Issues, Worklogs & Time in Status audit • HTML Macro for Confluence audit
| Keyword | Pivot Report | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #168 | #54 |
| form | #278 | #98 |
Both Pivot Report: Roll Up Epic Issues, Worklogs & Time in Status and HTML Macro for Confluence offer paid plans only. Pivot Report: Roll Up Epic Issues, Worklogs & Time in Status starts at From $0.5/yr; HTML Macro for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Pivot Report: Roll Up Epic Issues, Worklogs & Time in Status (5.0★, 80 reviews) and HTML Macro for Confluence (5.0★, 31 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
HTML Macro for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Pivot Report: Roll Up Epic Issues, Worklogs & Time in Status has the deeper published review base (80 vs 31), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Pivot Report: Roll Up Epic Issues, Worklogs & Time in Status typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (80 reviews). HTML Macro for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (31 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Pivot Report: Roll Up Epic Issues, Worklogs & Time in Status and HTML Macro for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from HTML Macro for Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.