Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Send | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Metric | Send Email to Page | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 ★ | ★ 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 22 | ★ 408 |
| Active installs | 39+ | 12,974+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | — | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM edges out Send Email to Page on rating (4.5★ vs 4.4★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 22), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Send Email to Page's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Send Email to Page's 22-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Send Email to Page audit • Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit
| Keyword | Send | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #246 | Not ranked |
| form | #356 | Not ranked |
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to Send Email to Page (4.4★ from 22 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 22), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Send Email to Page typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (22 reviews). Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Send Email to Page and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Send Email to Page" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.