Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Built by Atlassian. Connect Azure DevOps with Jira Software Cloud to sync and display development activity in your Jira project.
| Azure DevOps for Jira (Official) | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Metric | Azure DevOps for Jira (Official) | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.3 ★ | ★ 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 24 | ★ 408 |
| Active installs | 6,787+ | 12,974+ |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.5★ vs Azure DevOps for Jira (Official)'s 3.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Azure DevOps for Jira (Official) offers a free tier (Free) while Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Azure DevOps for Jira (Official)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Azure DevOps for Jira (Official)'s 24-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Azure DevOps for Jira (Official) audit • Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit
Azure DevOps for Jira (Official) is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to Azure DevOps for Jira (Official) (3.3★ from 24 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 3.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 24), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Azure DevOps for Jira (Official) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Azure DevOps for Jira (Official) and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Azure DevOps for Jira (Official)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.