Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Understand Scrum sprint health across planning, execution, and retrospectives. Compare committed vs completed story points, inspect assignee workload, review time tracking progress, and export sprint data for team discussions.
| ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview | Sprint Reviewer Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Save time and improve your overview of any project with any structure in Jira. Add live reports, progress bar visualizations, and Excel-like fast editing. ESU helps you better organize and manage your work.
| Metric | ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview | Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 44 | 29 |
| Active installs | 1,775+ | 92+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview at From $0/yr, Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview's 44-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview audit • Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira audit
| Keyword | ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview | Sprint Reviewer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| time | #298 | #379 |
Both ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview and Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira offer paid plans only. ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview starts at From $0/yr; Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 29 reviews) compared to ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview (4.1★ from 44 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview has the deeper published review base (44 vs 29), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (44 reviews). Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (29 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ESU - Sum Up KPI & Budget Reporting Project Epic Overview and Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.