Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
🏅 Structure your portfolio of cross-project releases, automate workflows, plan on roadmap, integrate DevOps - all in one solution
| Release Management | HTML Macro for Confluence | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
- Add custom HTML to Confluence pages - Use CSS and Javascript to enhance looks and functionality - Run code snippets - Embed external contents and web pages as Iframe
| Metric | Release Management: Workflows, Calendar & Roadmaps for Jira | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 44 | 31 |
| Active installs | 1,022+ | 2,327+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, HTML Macro for Confluence is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Release Management: Workflows, Calendar & Roadmaps for Jira's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Release Management: Workflows, Calendar & Roadmaps for Jira at From $0/yr, HTML Macro for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to HTML Macro for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Release Management: Workflows, Calendar & Roadmaps for Jira's 44-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than HTML Macro for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Release Management: Workflows, Calendar & Roadmaps for Jira audit • HTML Macro for Confluence audit
| Keyword | Release Management | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #54 |
| form | Not ranked | #98 |
Both Release Management: Workflows, Calendar & Roadmaps for Jira and HTML Macro for Confluence offer paid plans only. Release Management: Workflows, Calendar & Roadmaps for Jira starts at From $0/yr; HTML Macro for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
HTML Macro for Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to Release Management: Workflows, Calendar & Roadmaps for Jira (4.5★ from 44 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
HTML Macro for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Release Management: Workflows, Calendar & Roadmaps for Jira has the deeper published review base (44 vs 31), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Release Management: Workflows, Calendar & Roadmaps for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (44 reviews). HTML Macro for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (31 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Release Management: Workflows, Calendar & Roadmaps for Jira and HTML Macro for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from HTML Macro for Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.