Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Planning Poker is an agile estimation tool for Jira. It helps developers to estimate their effort on different tasks in terms of story points, T-Shirts etc. Works best for distributed teams, but can also be used by teams within the same location.
| Planning Poker ® | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Metric | Planning Poker ® | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 133 | ★ 406 |
| Active installs | 3,934+ | 13,551+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $1/yr |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Featured placements | — | 1 |
Planning Poker ® and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM are evenly matched on rating (4.6★ vs 4.5★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: Planning Poker ® at From $0/yr, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (406 reviews vs 133), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Planning Poker ®'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Planning Poker ® audit • Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit
Not featured in any section recently.
Both Planning Poker ® and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM offer paid plans only. Planning Poker ® starts at From $0/yr; Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Planning Poker ® (4.6★, 133 reviews) and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM (4.5★, 406 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Planning Poker ® fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has more onboarding documentation maturity (406 reviews vs 133), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Planning Poker ® typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (133 reviews). Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (406 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Planning Poker ® and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Planning Poker ®" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.