Planning Poker ® vs Multi Level & Tree Fields

Based on the data on this page, Multi Level & Tree Fields is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Planning Poker ®'s 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Planning Poker ® at From $0/yr, Multi Level & Tree Fields at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Planning Poker ® has the larger user base (134 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Multi Level & Tree Fields's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Multi Level & Tree Fields; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Planning Poker ®'s 134-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Multi Level & Tree Fields's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Planning Poker ® or Multi Level & Tree Fields cheaper?

Both Planning Poker ® and Multi Level & Tree Fields offer paid plans only. Planning Poker ® starts at From $0/yr; Multi Level & Tree Fields starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Planning Poker ® or Multi Level & Tree Fields?

Multi Level & Tree Fields has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 25 reviews) compared to Planning Poker ® (4.6★ from 134 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Planning Poker ® or Multi Level & Tree Fields?

Multi Level & Tree Fields holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Planning Poker ® or Multi Level & Tree Fields?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Planning Poker ® has the deeper published review base (134 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Planning Poker ® typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (134 reviews). Multi Level & Tree Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Planning Poker ® and Multi Level & Tree Fields?