Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
ActionableAgile® Analytics uses your Jira data and flow metrics to help improve how you complete work, become more predictable, and forecast with better accuracy - no matter your process. Stay secure by keeping your Jira issue data in Jira.
| ActionableAgile® Analytics | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Tempo creates embedded solutions that enable organizations, including some of the world’s most prestigious brands, to track, plan, manage and understand time, their most constrained resource.
| Metric | ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 32 | ★ 896 |
| Active installs | 1,462+ | 26,977+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1.4/yr | ★ From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking are evenly matched on rating (4.1★ vs 4.1★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing is noticeably different: Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking at From $1/yr vs ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts at From $1.4/yr (~40% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage teams the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market teams should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 32), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts audit • Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit
| Keyword | ActionableAgile® Analytics | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #7 |
Both ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking offer paid plans only. ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts starts at From $1.4/yr; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts (4.1★, 32 reviews) and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.1★, 896 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking holds the higher average rating (4.1★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 32), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (32 reviews). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.