ActionableAgile® Analytics vs Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM

Based on the data on this page, Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.5★ vs ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing is noticeably different: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr vs ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts at From $1.4/yr (~40% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage teams the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market teams should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified.

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 32), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts's 32-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM cheaper?

Both ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts and Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM offer paid plans only. ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts starts at From $1.4/yr; Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM?

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 408 reviews) compared to ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts (4.1★ from 32 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM?

Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, ActionableAgile® Analytics: Kanban/ Agile Metrics, Forecasts or Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 32), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.