Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics) vs draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts edges out Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics) on rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics) at From $0/yr, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the larger user base (1,204 reviews vs 23), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics)'s 23-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics) or draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts cheaper?

Both Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics) and draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts offer paid plans only. Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics) starts at From $0/yr; draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics) or draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 1,204 reviews) compared to Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics) (4.7★ from 23 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics) or draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Process Templates for Jira (Issue Templates & Epics) or draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the deeper published review base (1,204 vs 23), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.