Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Understand Scrum sprint health across planning, execution, and retrospectives. Compare committed vs completed story points, inspect assignee workload, review time tracking progress, and export sprint data for team discussions.
| Easy Clone | Sprint Reviewer Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Clone, copy or duplicate a Jira issue, an Epic with all its sub-tasks and child issues, or a whole JQL result set, within a project or to another with a different schema. Recursive hierarchy, no depth limit. Reusable templates, no admin setup.
| Metric | Easy Clone: Bulk Clone Issues, Epics & Sub-tasks | Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 36 | 29 |
| Active installs | 1,037+ | 92+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira edges out Easy Clone: Bulk Clone Issues, Epics & Sub-tasks on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Easy Clone: Bulk Clone Issues, Epics & Sub-tasks at From $0/yr, Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Easy Clone: Bulk Clone Issues, Epics & Sub-tasks's 36-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Easy Clone: Bulk Clone Issues, Epics & Sub-tasks audit • Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira audit
| Keyword | Easy Clone | Sprint Reviewer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #89 |
| form | Not ranked | #179 |
| time | Not ranked | #379 |
Both Easy Clone: Bulk Clone Issues, Epics & Sub-tasks and Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira offer paid plans only. Easy Clone: Bulk Clone Issues, Epics & Sub-tasks starts at From $0/yr; Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 29 reviews) compared to Easy Clone: Bulk Clone Issues, Epics & Sub-tasks (4.9★ from 36 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Easy Clone: Bulk Clone Issues, Epics & Sub-tasks has the deeper published review base (36 vs 29), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Easy Clone: Bulk Clone Issues, Epics & Sub-tasks typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (36 reviews). Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (29 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Easy Clone: Bulk Clone Issues, Epics & Sub-tasks and Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Sprint Reviewer Pro: Scrum Sprint Metrics for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.