AutoReply scores 43/100 (grade D) — 8 fails and 7 warnings across 21 checks.
Biggest lever: Description & Content — fixing its two open checks (Description and Description Keywords) is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score.
Top strength: Title Optimization at 63/100. Audited Oct 21, 2026.
Top fixes
Language Count(Languages, medium impact, up to 10 points) — No languages listed
Screenshot Count(Visual Assets, high impact, up to 6.7 points) — No screenshots
Description(Description & Content, high impact, up to 6.2 points) — Missing
43/100
Grade D
Critical gaps
Section breakdown
Detailed checks & fixes
Title Length9/50 chars — under 50% of limit
Title KeywordsOnly 1 keyword found
Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
Separator UsageShort title — separator not needed
Medium impact
Title Length
Your title uses only 9 of 50 available characters. Add relevant keywords to improve discoverability.
Introduction130/200 chars
Intro Keywords15 unique keywords
DescriptionMissing
Description KeywordsNo keywords in description
High impact
Description
Add a detailed app description explaining features, benefits, and use cases.
App IconApp icon is set
Screenshot CountNo screenshots
Hero VideoNo video content found
High impact
Screenshot Count
Add at least 5 high-quality screenshots showing your app's key features and UI.
Category CountNo categories
Feature TagsNo feature tags
Integrations1 integrations listed
High impact
Category Count
Assign your app to relevant categories — this is essential for marketplace discoverability.
Demo StoreNo demo store
Privacy PolicyNo privacy policy
FAQNo FAQ
DocumentationNo documentation link
TutorialNo tutorial or guide
Pricing PlansNo pricing plans listed
Medium impact
Demo Store
Set up a demo store so merchants can preview your app before installing.
Language CountNo languages listed
Medium impact
Language Count
Add language support information. Multi-language apps reach significantly more merchants.
Track how this score changes over time
Get alerts when AutoReply or any rival changes their listing — free.
6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
How AutoReply's 43/100 breaks down
AutoReply's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade D). Top strength: Title Optimization at 63/100. Biggest lever: Description & Content — fixing its two open checks (Description and Description Keywords) is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Visual Assets (up to 10 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 10 points), Languages (up to 10 points), Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points) and Title Optimization (up to 5.6 points).
The rubric — its 6 sections, their weights, every check and the grade bands — is identical for every Zoom App Marketplace listing and is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
Frequently asked questions
What is AutoReply's Zoom listing audit score?
AutoReply scores 43/100 (grade D) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 63/100, Description & Content 50/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 33/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. The rubric is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable.
What is AutoReply doing well?
AutoReply's strongest section is Title Optimization at 63/100; 2 of 4 checks in it pass and 2 are open.
What should AutoReply fix first?
Description & Content: Description (Missing; high impact), Description Keywords (No keywords in description; medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 12.5 points on the overall score — more than any other section; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.