Loading content…
TOP 3 ALTERNATIVES — RANKED
Three you should evaluate first.
Filtered from 12 candidates by feature similarity, audit score, and review velocity. The hero treatment is editorial — these earned more space because the data did.
Gutenberg Blocks for AMP with Design Library
amp#1TOP PICK
5.004 reviews
Not auditedAudit score
Pick if you're surveying the marketplace
Widely used on this marketplace — not a like-for-like swap. AppRanks found no app sharing oEmbed Infogram's category, so this is not a replacement for it — it is a widely-used amp option shown for market context. Compare it against your own requirements rather than as a swap.
AMP for Contact Form 7
amp#2RUNNER-UP
5.004 reviews
Not auditedAudit score
Pick if you're cost-sensitive
Adjacent tool, different job. Different use case from oEmbed Infogram. Listed because it is among the most-adopted amp apps on this marketplace, not because it covers the same job.
Preload Fullpage Cache
amp#3VALUE PICK
5.003 reviews
Not auditedAudit score
Pick if you're mapping adjacent tooling
Popular alternative to evaluate on its own merits. Solves a different problem than oEmbed Infogram. Useful market context; verify the capability overlap yourself before treating it as an option.
SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON
oEmbed Infogram versus the top 3.
Five rows, all loaded above the fold. Wins are highlighted; nothing's hidden behind a tab.
RANKS #4 THROUGH #12
The next 9, denser.
Lower-ranked but legitimate. Click any row for the full profile — or compare side-by-side with oEmbed Infogram.
How these alternatives are ranked
Scored daily. Three signals, weighted and blended. No vendor money changes anything.
45%Feature similarity
N-gram match against oEmbed Infogram's feature signature, weighted by category overlap.
35%Audit + rating
Listing quality (0–100) blended with rolling 90-day rating average. Penalizes thin listings.
20%Review velocity
Reviews added in trailing 30 days, normalized by category baseline. Surfaces rising challengers.
Every WordPress alternative on this page is scraped, normalized, and re-scored every 24 hours. We don't accept paid placement, vendor-funded "best of" content, or sponsored ranking — and we publish the rules so you can audit them yourself. If a vendor disagrees with their position, that's between them and the data.
WHEN DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO SWITCH FROM OEMBED INFOGRAM?
Four reasons people leave.
Decision triggers, not marketing. If two or more apply, your shortlist starts with the apps named below each card.
Pricing has outgrown your usage
If your usage of oEmbed Infogram has crossed a pricing-tier breakpoint, per-unit cost is usually where alternatives diverge most clearly. Some apps in the list above carry a free tier; others are paid from day one. Compare the published plans on each alternative's page against your current bill — the gap is the only number worth acting on, and it is specific to your usage.
AMP for Contact Form 7 · Gutenberg Blocks for AMP with Design LibraryYou need a feature outside the focus
Each WordPress category has a feature spectrum. The "Similar feature set" badge above marks alternatives whose feature signature most overlaps with oEmbed Infogram. The "Category leader" badge marks apps that may approach the same category from a different feature angle — useful if you want to widen rather than narrow your toolset.
Gutenberg Blocks for AMP with Design LibrarySupport response has slowed you down
Support quality is the hardest thing to read from a listing, and it is the most common reason a switch gets made. Read the most RECENT reviews on each alternative's profile rather than the lifetime average — recency is what tells you how the app is supported today, and trailing review velocity is the freshest signal AppRanks tracks.
FREQUENTLY ASKED
Answers built from the data.
Built from the same scores the ranking uses — so they won't contradict the table.
For most accounts under typical category usage, the answer depends on tier. Gutenberg Blocks for AMP with Design Library is in the unknown band (—), while oEmbed Infogram is unknown (—). At parity scale, the cheaper option can save 30–60% — but feature-for-feature swaps usually narrow the gap above the second tier.
VERDICT · UPDATED TODAY
If you're moving from oEmbed Infogram, the most common landing spots are Gutenberg Blocks for AMP with Design Library (unknown feature match, audit null/100) and AMP for Contact Form 7 (pricing leverage + breadth). Skip Mediavine AMP Redirect unless your use case is unusual.
If feature parity matters most
→ Gutenberg Blocks for AMP with Design Library
Unknown feature parity. Audit null, 5.00★.
If pricing matters most
→ AMP for Contact Form 7
Best for cost-sensitive teams. 5.00★ across 4 reviews.
If you're scaling enterprise
→ Preload Fullpage Cache
Strongest scale fit when category usage exceeds typical thresholds. Vendor-evaluate before committing.
Continue your research
Audit oEmbed Infogram's listing
See where oEmbed Infogram ranks 0–100 on listing completeness, screenshots, and description quality.
Open auditoEmbed Infogram vs Gutenberg Blocks for AMP with Design Library
Side-by-side feature deltas, shared keywords, rating curves over the trailing 12 months.
Open compareWordPress category leaders
Highest-rated WordPress apps by intent. The category-by-category leaderboard.
Open best
